Visar resultat för taggarna 'association'.

  • Sök efter taggar

    Skriv taggar separerade med kommatecken.
  • Sök efter författare



  • LCHF
    • LCHF för nybörjare
    • LCHF-erfarenheter
    • Allmänt om LCHF
  • Mer om livsstil och hälsa
    • Träning
    • Näringslära
    • Övrigt
  • Om forumet
    • Om forumet


  • AGF
  • Bloggen
  • Riitta Montonen
  • Peters n=1 experiment för att sänka blodglukosen

Hitta resultat i...

Hitta resultat som...

Datum skapat

  • Start


Senast uppdaterad

  • Start


Filtrera efter antalet...

Gick med

  • Start





Website URL







Hittade 1 resultat

  1. Ny register- och frågeformulärstudie visar stark association mellan mammans glutenintag och att barnet utvecklar TYP 1 diabetes. Zoe Harcombe publicerar snart sin kommentar. What is already known on this topic In an animal model of type 1 diabetes, a gluten free maternal diet during pregnancy almost completely prevented type 1 diabetes in offspring However, human studies have not shown an association between maternal gluten intake during pregnancy and the risk of type 1 diabetes in offspring What this study adds In a study population of 67 565 pregnancies (63 529 women), the incidence of type 1 diabetes among children in the cohort was 0.37% (n=247) with a mean follow-up period of 15.6 years (standard deviation 1.4) The risk of type 1 diabetes in offspring increased proportionally with maternal gluten intake during pregnancy (adjusted hazard ratio 1.31 (95% confidence interval 1.001 to 1.72) per 10 g/day increase of gluten intake) Mothers with the highest gluten intake versus those with the lowest gluten intake (≥20 v <7 g/day) had double the risk of type 1 diabetes development in their offspring (adjusted hazard ratio 2.00 (95% confidence interval 1.02 to 4.00)) https://www.bmj.com/content/362/bmj.k3547.long https://www.webmd.com/baby/news/20180919/gluten-in-pregnancy-tied-to-babys-type-1-diabetes#1 Begränsningar i studien. Despite the large study size, the statistical power of our study was still modest because of the low number of cases of type 1 diabetes (n=247) in our study population, which was reflected by some associations that were only just below the threshold set for formal significance (α=0.05). In addition, the role of unmeasured or unidentified confounders can never be fully excluded in observational studies. Confirmation of our findings in another comparable but independent dataset is therefore warranted. Dietary assessment methods that rely on the participants’ ability to report their habitual diet are inevitably subject to uncertainties, owing to the inherent difficulty in recalling diet accurately. Although gluten containing foods are easy to identify, and the protein fractions of gluten in wheat, rye, and barley are known, gluten is also intentionally added during production to certain types of flour, bread, and other foods, which we were unable to account for. This unaccountable addition of gluten would lead to a systematic underestimation of intake. Another limitation was that we do not know whether mothers with a low intake of gluten during pregnancy also serve a low gluten diet to their infants. However, in our animal experiments, a gluten free diet fed to mothers during pregnancy was far more effective in preventing diabetes in the offspring than a gluten free diet fed to the offspring.